# Current limitations

Worldview Sorter offers authored, source-linked philosophical interpretations. The items, evidence rules, routes, thresholds, and affinities have **not** been established as a validated psychological assessment. Results describe the propositions supported, opposed, or left open by recorded answers. They do not assign an ideology, diagnose a person, estimate a population percentile, or give a probability of belonging to a tradition.

Quick and Standard ask fewer questions than Full. An unasked proposition remains **not measured** unless the administered questions independently support it. **Insufficient evidence** means relevant content was asked but the recorded answers do not justify a direction. Affinities compare only interpreted propositions; defining doctrine that the route does not measure remains visibly unmeasured. Multiple traditions may overlap, and no close affinity is a normal outcome.

The initial affinity catalog is deliberately small. Several defining commitments in its six traditions remain unmeasured by the pilot. Spanish and Arabic philosophical wording is not approved for respondent use; the interface marks those options unavailable. The current beta has no account or server-side save for ordinary quiz attempts: the active quiz is stored in this browser, and a downloaded backup is needed to retain it if browser storage is cleared or the device is lost.

The static public site does not send product events or accept feedback or research contributions. The separate development/research server has optional first-party product events and feedback when an operator enables them; its consented research contribution flow is not part of this GitHub Pages deployment.